Platform profile

Car Stock

Automotive & Insurance Ecosystem

Automotive Insurance, Spare Parts & Repair Management Ecosystem

Digital infrastructure for automotive claims, repairs, spare parts sourcing and procurement — connecting insurance companies, garages, salvage yards, parts suppliers and vehicle data in one network.

Market traction

Market stage

Advanced sector discussions

Insurance sector engagement

  • Meetings with the Palestinian Insurance Federation
  • Engagement with the Federation’s Secretary
  • Technical committee discussions
  • Preliminary cooperation framework reached

Engagement path

  1. Step 1: Insurance Federation meetings
  2. Step 2: Technical committee
  3. Step 3: Preliminary cooperation framework

Strategic engagement with the Palestinian insurance sector

Status Advanced discussions · Preliminary cooperation framework

A series of working meetings has been held with the Palestinian Insurance Federation regarding Car Stock. The meetings included the Federation’s Secretary, Mr. Kayed Ma’ayari, together with members of the relevant technical committee, and covered both the technical and the commercial dimensions of the platform.

The discussions addressed the platform’s operating model: how insurance companies, garages, salvage yards and spare parts suppliers would be connected inside one network; how repair requests and requests for quotation would be managed; and what measurable value the platform can add to an insurer’s claim-handling process.

An advanced preliminary understanding on the cooperation mechanism has been reached, and work continues towards a final formulation acceptable to all parties. Until a formal instrument is executed, this engagement is presented as a preliminary cooperation framework — not as a signed partnership or a contract.

Executive Overview

Car Stock is a digital ecosystem for the automotive insurance and aftermarket sector. It connects the four parties that must cooperate to repair a vehicle — the insurance company that authorises and pays, the garage that performs the work, the spare parts supplier and the salvage yard that source the components — inside one platform where the request, the offers, the approval, the order and the repair status are all recorded.

It is not a spare parts online store. A store sells items; Car Stock manages a process: a claim generates a repair requirement, that requirement generates a demand for specific parts and labour, that demand is exposed to a competing supply base, offers are compared under the insurer’s own policy, and the resulting decision is documented end to end.

The platform also carries a historical vehicle market dataset exceeding five years, maintained and updated to the previous month, and an electronic marketplace covering new, used and salvage parts. Together these turn a fragmented, phone-driven market into a measurable procurement channel.

  • Claims to repair, in one flow

    Repair requirement, parts sourcing, quotation, approval, order and tracking connected as one process.

  • Competitive by design

    Multiple garages and suppliers respond to the same request under comparable terms.

  • Documented decisions

    Every offer, comparison and approval is recorded, producing an audit trail for settlement.

Industry Challenge

Motor insurance is a high-frequency, low-margin business in which claim settlement cost is decided by hundreds of small operational decisions: which garage repairs the vehicle, whether a part is new, used or salvaged, what price is accepted, and how long the vehicle stays out of service.

Almost all of these decisions are currently made through phone calls, informal relationships and manual estimates. The insurer cannot easily compare offers, the garage spends hours searching for parts, the supplier has no visibility of demand until someone calls, and the salvage yard — which often holds exactly the part needed — is entirely outside the digital process.

The result is a market where price dispersion is wide, cycle times are long, and neither the insurer nor the regulator can reconstruct why a specific settlement cost what it cost.

The Problem

  • For insurance companies

    • No structured way to compare repair offers on equal terms
    • Claim cost driven by relationships rather than by market price
    • Long settlement cycles and extended vehicle downtime
    • Weak audit trail behind approval decisions
    • Limited data on which garages and parts actually perform
  • For garages

    • Hours lost searching for a single part across scattered suppliers
    • No single view of what is available, where, and at what price
    • Work stalled while waiting for insurer approval
    • Difficulty proving the cost basis of an estimate
  • For suppliers & salvage yards

    • Demand is invisible until a customer calls
    • Stock sits idle while an identical part is being searched for elsewhere
    • Salvage inventory is largely undocumented and unsearchable
    • No structured channel to reach insurers and garage networks

Our Solution

Car Stock digitises the repair transaction itself. An insurance company issues a repair request against a claim. The request describes the vehicle, the damage and the required parts and work. It is then exposed to the relevant supply base: approved garages, parts suppliers and salvage yards.

Each responder submits a structured offer — labour cost, parts, total repair cost, availability and estimated completion. The insurer compares offers side by side under its own policy rules, approves one, and the platform converts that approval into an order with tracked repair status through to completion.

The same infrastructure supports direct parts sourcing for garages, an electronic marketplace for new, used and salvage parts, and a vehicle data layer used to identify the correct part for the correct vehicle — the step where most manual errors and returns originate.

How The Platform Works

  • Demand side

    • Insurance companies issue repair requests and parts requirements linked to claims
    • Garages issue parts requests when an item is not in their usual stock
    • Fleet operators can use the same request mechanism for maintenance
  • Supply side

    • Parts suppliers publish catalogue, availability and pricing
    • Salvage yards register recovered parts inventory and make it searchable
    • Garages submit repair offers including labour and parts
  • Matching layer

    • Search by part number, OEM number, make, model and year
    • Vehicle data used to validate part fitment
    • Availability and price surfaced across suppliers, garages and salvage yards
  • Decision & fulfilment layer

    • Structured offer comparison under insurer policy rules
    • Approval, order issuance and repair status tracking
    • Complete transaction record retained for settlement and audit

Stakeholders

  • Insurance companies

    Claim cost control, comparable offers, faster settlement and a documented decision trail.

  • Garages & repair centres

    Access to insurer work, faster parts sourcing and less time lost on phone searching.

  • Spare parts suppliers

    Visible demand, a structured sales channel and reduced idle stock.

  • Salvage yards

    Undocumented inventory becomes searchable and sellable to a national demand base.

  • Fleet operators

    Comparable maintenance and repair sourcing across a competing service base.

  • Vehicle owners

    Shorter downtime as approval and sourcing steps stop being sequential phone tasks.

Core Capabilities

  • Repair request & tendering

    • Repair requests issued by insurers against claims
    • Structured offer submission by garages
    • Side-by-side comparison and policy-based selection
    • Approval, order issuance and status tracking
  • Parts sourcing

    • Search across suppliers, garages and salvage yards
    • Request for quotation and multi-offer comparison
    • Part number, OEM number and vehicle-based matching
  • Marketplace

    • New, used and salvage parts listings
    • Catalogue attributes: part number, OEM, make, model, year, availability, price
    • Supplier storefronts and promotional placement
  • Vehicle data layer

    • Historical vehicle market dataset exceeding five years
    • Updated to the previous month
    • Used for part fitment, claim context and market analysis
  • Network administration

    • Approved provider lists per insurer
    • Roles, permissions and visibility boundaries
    • Transaction history and audit trail

Modules

Module groups
6
Modules listed
35
  • Insurance workspace (8 modules)

    • Claims / Repair Requests
    • Required Parts
    • Approved Provider Network
    • Offer Comparison
    • Approvals
    • Orders
    • Repair Tracking
    • Reports
  • Garage workspace (6 modules)

    • Incoming Repair Requests
    • Offer Submission
    • Labour & Parts Estimation
    • Parts Requests
    • Job Status
    • Completion & Handover
  • Supplier workspace (6 modules)

    • Catalogue Management
    • Inventory & Availability
    • Pricing
    • Quotation Requests
    • Orders
    • Promotions & Listings
  • Salvage yard workspace (5 modules)

    • Recovered Parts Registration
    • Vehicle-Based Inventory
    • Availability & Condition
    • Quotation Requests
    • Sales Orders
  • Marketplace (5 modules)

    • Product Listings
    • Search & Filters
    • Part Number / OEM Matching
    • Vehicle Compatibility
    • Offers & Featured Placement
  • Data & administration (5 modules)

    • Vehicle Data Repository
    • Users, Roles & Permissions
    • Provider Approval
    • Transaction Log & Audit Trail
    • Analytics & Reporting
Note:

Capabilities beyond those listed should be treated as configurable or future capability and confirmed during scoping.

Workflow

The insurance repair workflow is the platform’s central transaction. Every step produces a record that is later used for settlement, cost analysis and audit.

How it connects

  1. 01 Insurance company
  2. 02 Claim / repair request
  3. 03 Required parts
  4. 04 Search available inventory
  5. 05 Garages / suppliers
  6. 06 Salvage yards
  7. 07 Request for quotation
  8. 08 Multiple offers
  9. 09 Comparison
  10. 10 Approval
  11. 11 Order
  12. 12 Repair
  13. 13 Tracking
  14. 14 Completion
  • What the insurer compares

    • Labour cost
    • Spare parts (new / used / salvage)
    • Total repair cost
    • Availability
    • Estimated completion time
    • Offer details and conditions

Business Value

Repair tendering is where the platform’s economics concentrate: it converts a relationship-driven cost into a competitive, documented one.

  • For claim cost

    • Increased competition among garages and suppliers on the same request
    • Price transparency across new, used and salvage options
    • Selection based on insurer policy rather than availability of a phone contact
  • For cycle time

    • Fewer manual calls between insurer, garage and supplier
    • Faster parts discovery through one search across the whole network
    • Faster claim progression because approval is a platform action, not a meeting
  • For governance

    • Every offer and decision documented with time and identity
    • Complete audit trail supporting settlement review and dispute resolution
    • Supplier and garage performance becomes measurable over time

Benefits by Stakeholder

Benefits by Stakeholder
Stakeholder Primary benefit What changes in practice
Insurance company Claim cost control Comparable competing offers instead of single-source estimates
Claims department Speed & traceability Approvals executed and recorded inside one workflow
Garage Work volume & sourcing Access to insurer requests and a single parts search
Parts supplier Demand visibility Structured requests instead of waiting for calls
Salvage yard Inventory monetisation Undocumented stock becomes searchable and sellable
Fleet operator Maintenance cost Competitive sourcing for repairs across providers
Vehicle owner Downtime Shorter waiting between damage and repair start

Data Advantage

Car Stock holds a historical vehicle market dataset covering more than five years and maintained up to the previous month. This is a strategic automotive data asset: it supports accurate part fitment, provides context for claim assessment, and forms the basis for market-level analysis of the vehicle population and its service requirements.

A second dataset is generated by the platform itself. Every repair request, offer, approval and fulfilled order creates structured records of price behaviour, part demand, garage responsiveness and repair cycle times. Over time this transaction history becomes more commercially valuable than any static database, because it describes what the market actually does rather than what it contains.

No count of vehicles or records is claimed in this profile; dataset scope and composition are disclosed under NDA during commercial discussions.

Integration Opportunities

The platform is designed to integrate through APIs with the institutions that hold authoritative vehicle and policy data. Each of the following is an integration opportunity requiring formal approval and technical enablement by the counterparty; none is presented as currently live.

  • Institutional data

    • Ministry of Transport — vehicle registration and technical data verification
    • Authorised data providers — reference vehicle and parts catalogues
  • Insurance systems

    • Policy and claim systems — claim reference, coverage and settlement exchange
    • Approval workflow alignment with each insurer’s internal policy
  • Commercial systems

    • Supplier ERP and inventory systems for live availability
    • Payment and electronic collection providers
    • Logistics providers for parts delivery
Note:

Electronic verification of vehicle data reduces fraud exposure, prevents wrong-part ordering and shortens claim assessment. Status: planned integration opportunity.

Competitive Advantages

  • Process, not catalogue

    Competitors sell parts listings; Car Stock manages the claim-to-repair transaction with approvals and audit trail.

  • Salvage integration

    Salvage yards are usually invisible to digital procurement; including them widens supply and lowers claim cost.

  • Historical vehicle data

    A five-year-plus dataset updated monthly is difficult and slow for a new entrant to reproduce.

  • Multi-sided lock-in

    Value depends on insurers, garages, suppliers and salvage yards being present together — hard to replicate one side at a time.

  • Audit-grade record

    Documented offers and approvals support settlement review — a requirement insurers cannot ignore.

  • Local supply knowledge

    Understanding of how parts actually move in the local market, including used and salvage channels.

Revenue Streams

Revenue Streams
Stream Payer Basis
Insurance company subscription Insurer Annual platform access per company or per user tier
Garage subscription Garage Monthly or annual access to insurer requests and sourcing
Supplier subscription Supplier Catalogue publishing and demand access
Salvage yard subscription Salvage yard Inventory listing and quotation participation
Marketplace commission Seller Percentage of marketplace transactions
Tender success fee Winning garage / supplier Fee on awarded repair tenders
Transaction fees Transacting party Per order or per completed repair
Premium listings Supplier Featured placement in search and marketplace
Advertising Sector brands Parts, tyres, lubricants and equipment brands
Data services Insurers / institutions Vehicle and market data services, subject to permissions
Analytics Insurers / suppliers Price behaviour, demand and performance analytics
API & enterprise integration Insurer / large supplier Setup and recurring integration fees

Recommended Business Model

For Palestine, we recommend anchoring the model on insurance company subscriptions plus a tender success fee, with low-friction access for garages, suppliers and salvage yards in the early phase.

The logic is that the insurer is the party with the clearest financial return: if structured competition reduces average claim cost, the platform pays for itself out of savings, which makes the subscription an operating-cost decision rather than a technology purchase. Charging the supply side heavily at the start would suppress exactly the participation that makes the insurer’s comparison valuable.

Once density is achieved — enough garages, suppliers and salvage yards responding to each request — marketplace commission, premium listings, advertising and analytics can be layered on, because at that point the supply side is receiving measurable demand rather than a promise of it.

  • Phase 1 — Anchor the insurers

    Insurer subscription + tender success fee. Free or nominal access for garages, suppliers and salvage yards to build supply density.

  • Phase 2 — Monetise supply access

    Tiered supplier and garage subscriptions, marketplace commission and premium listings once demand flow is proven.

  • Phase 3 — Data & enterprise

    Analytics subscriptions, data services and enterprise API integrations with insurers and large suppliers.

Palestine Market Opportunity

The Palestinian motor insurance and aftermarket sector has the structural characteristics that make this kind of platform work: a concentrated set of insurance companies, a large and fragmented base of garages and parts suppliers, an active used and salvage parts culture, and claim processes that are still largely manual.

Adoption drivers: pressure on insurers to control claim cost, the operational burden of manual parts searching on garages, the commercial incentive for suppliers to access insurer-driven demand, and the opportunity for salvage yards to monetise inventory that is currently unsearchable.

Market barriers: existing informal relationships between insurers and specific garages, digital readiness among smaller garages and yards, price-list discipline among suppliers, and the need for insurers to align internal approval policy with a platform workflow. These are adoption barriers rather than technology barriers, and are addressed by onboarding support and phased rollout with one insurer at a time.

  • Segments & decision makers

    • Buyers: insurance companies, large garage networks, fleet operators
    • Decision makers: claims managers, operations managers, procurement, general management
    • Users: claims officers, garage managers, parts staff, salvage yard operators
  • How to size the market (TAM / SAM / SOM)

    • TAM = annual motor claim repair spend + independent aftermarket parts spend
    • SAM = the share of that spend transacted by insurers and organised garages reachable by the platform
    • SOM = SAM × achievable platform penetration over 3 years × effective take rate (subscription + fees)
    • Market data required for validation: motor premium and claim volumes, garage and supplier counts, average repair value
Note:

Market data required for validation. No claim volume, market size or share is asserted here.

Network Effect

Car Stock is a four-sided network, and each side strengthens the others in a way that becomes progressively harder to displace.

More insurance companies mean more repair requests, which makes participation commercially necessary for garages. More garages mean more competing offers, which improves the insurer’s cost outcome and justifies the subscription. More suppliers and salvage yards mean higher part availability, which shortens repair time and increases the share of requests that can be fulfilled inside the platform. And every fulfilled request enriches the pricing and availability history, which improves matching for everyone.

How it connects

  1. 01 More insurers
  2. 02 More requests
  3. 03 More garages & suppliers
  4. 04 More available parts
  5. 05 Faster, cheaper repairs
  6. 06 More insurers

Growth Opportunities

  • Fleet & corporate maintenance

    The same tendering mechanism applies to fleet maintenance procurement outside insurance claims.

  • Parts logistics

    Integrated delivery of ordered parts between suppliers, salvage yards and garages. Roadmap capability.

  • Insurance analytics

    Claim cost benchmarking, garage performance and parts price indices as a subscription product.

  • Supplier financing partnerships

    Transaction history can support credit assessment by financial partners. Opportunity, subject to regulation.

  • Adjacent vehicle services

    Tyres, batteries, periodic maintenance and inspection services using the same network.

  • Regional replication

    The insurer–garage–salvage structure is regional; the model can be redeployed with local data partners.

Future Roadmap

  1. Near term

    • Deeper insurer policy configuration for offer selection rules
    • Expanded salvage inventory onboarding tools
    • Improved part matching by vehicle attributes
  2. Medium term

    • Institutional data integrations subject to approval
    • Repair performance and price analytics for insurers
    • Logistics and delivery coordination for parts
  3. Longer term

    • Sector-level pricing indices
    • Fleet and corporate procurement module
    • Regional deployment with local data partnerships

Business Model Canvas

Customer Segments

  • Insurance companies
  • Garages & repair centres
  • Spare parts suppliers
  • Salvage yards
  • Fleet operators

Value Proposition

  • Competitive repair tendering
  • One search across all available parts
  • Lower claim cost and shorter cycle time
  • Documented, auditable decisions
  • Access to insurer-driven demand

Channels

  • Direct sales to insurers
  • Garage and supplier onboarding campaigns
  • Sector associations and events
  • Marketplace discovery

Customer Relationships

  • Enterprise account management for insurers
  • Onboarding and training for garages and yards
  • Supplier commercial support

Revenue Streams

  • Subscriptions (insurer, garage, supplier, salvage)
  • Tender success fees
  • Marketplace commission
  • Premium listings & advertising
  • Data & analytics services
  • API integration fees

Key Activities

  • Platform development
  • Network onboarding
  • Vehicle data maintenance
  • Catalogue and matching quality
  • Insurer policy configuration

Key Resources

  • 5+ years historical vehicle dataset
  • Transaction history
  • Provider network
  • Platform engineering team

Key Partners

  • Insurance companies
  • Garage networks
  • Parts suppliers & importers
  • Salvage yards
  • Authorised data providers
  • Payment and logistics providers

Cost Structure

  • Engineering & platform operations
  • Data acquisition and maintenance
  • Network onboarding & support
  • Sales and account management
  • Hosting & infrastructure

Portfolio

Other platforms

Each platform serves a different sector, and all of them are built on the same engineering foundations.

View all platforms

Vitara

Healthcare & Hospital ERP

One digital operating environment that unifies clinical, administrative, operational, logistics and financial processes across a hospital or an entire health network — more than 70 modules built around the patient journey.

  1. Patient
  2. Clinical
  3. Operational
  4. Financial

Sila

Connected Commerce Ecosystem

Commerce infrastructure connecting suppliers, merchants, consumers and delivery companies — with point of sale as the operational entry point and zero commission on core merchant sales.

  1. Supplier
  2. Merchant
  3. Consumer
  4. Delivery

Basmah

Dental Digital Ecosystem

A sector-wide digital ecosystem for dentistry: clinic management for the dentist, an electronic channel to laboratories and radiology centres, a professional membership layer, and a specialised marketplace — with free core access for dentists.

  1. Dentist
  2. Patient
  3. Lab
  4. Supplier
  5. Professional network

Back to all platforms

Contact

Let’s discuss the platform that fits your sector

Whether you are a ministry, a hospital, an insurer, a supplier, a retail network or a professional body — the first step is a working session on your actual process, not a product demo.

Contact us

Menu

Theme

Request a demo